Wednesday, December 25, 2013

School Board Hears Report on Residents’ Ideas for New School




by Loumarie I. Rodriguez
Published:
Wednesday, December 25, 2013 7:07 AM EST
BRIDGEWATER-ROXBURY-WASHINGTON — Architects Fletcher-Thompson and ARCADIS told the Region 12 Board of Education at its Monday, December 16, meeting, their findings of what residents would like to see in a new consolidated elementary school building.

Representatives from both firms and O&G Industries presented a PowerPoint presentation on those findings, gleaned from meetings in each of the region’s three towns, during which the firms asked residents what they would like to see in s consolidated Pre-K to Grade 5 elementary school building.

“What we were looking for from the three community meetings was feedback on what would you like to see, what are your concerns, what would be your wants and priorities and so forth with the new Pre-K to Grade 5 school,” said Angela Cayhill of Fletcher-Thompson. “This is a part of the process as designers.”

Ms. Cayhill explained representatives of Fletcher-Thompson also gets feedback from administrators, teachers and other staff members. She said it’s important to hear directly from the community since each school district is different.

The current plan of design would be for 300 students, which is the smallest category for reimbursement for Connecticut.

The new building would have some wiggle room in case there is an increase in population in the next few years.

“We have enrollment projections, but there was definite concern over how could we design so we don’t over-build, yet we don’t want to under-build either,” Ms. Cayhill said.

“We want to be able to provide any room for expansion that might happen in the future.”

While residents in the three towns had different, local concerns, they did share common ideas for the new school building.

One main concern was that a new school have a strong community feel. Other common suggestions were safety and security, cost-efficient design, spaces to support Common Core standards, technology and sustainabilty and common use of the school.


Other items addressed were the need for a campus feel and the relationship between the elementary school and Shepaug Middle High School.

“What do you not have in your existing elementary schools that maybe the students and the community would look forward to?” Ms. Cayhill asked. “A lot of the groups came back to the core of students’ education which is their basic curriculum.

“These students are very high performing in the schools where they are and that has to be maintained. The focus should be on students’ performance and the core educational needs of the students.”

Residents wanted a new elementary school building to be self-sustainable and energy efficient.

Daniel L. Casinelli, a principal at Fletcher-Thompson, said the next step is to explore conceptual designs based on program needs and residents’ input.

The firm plans to do a site visit and make sure the area is able to support the building.

Diagrams and a conceptual design will be created to provide residents with images of what the elementary school will look like. A cost estimate will be created after the conceptual design is finalized.

“One of the ideas that we looked at was the pond in the back of the site and how to [use] that [in] the design of the building,” said Mr. Casinelli. “Also use [the pond[] as an educational tool for students or we can look at other parts of the site.”

He said Fletcher-Thompson is trying to identify all items necessary in order to create the cost estimate. After gathering information, the firm will create a design narrative.

The narrative will give details of the design approach and the elements that will be incorporated into the building. The narrative is given to an estimator who estimates the cost of work.

Once the cost is determined, the firm will do an analysis to make sure everything is covered.

The design process should take 30 to 35 days to complete and by the end of February, should be ready to present, Mr. Casinelli said.

Kenneth Biega, assistant vice president of O&G Industries, told the board that by the time Fletcher-Thompson comes out with a design, his company will be ready with the estimate.

“We’ve done more schools than anyone in the state,” said Mr. Biega. “We have the date and we know what it’s going to cost per square inch, whether it’s an elementary school or a high school.”

Superintendent Dr. Patricia Cosentino told the board the representatives were not there to sell the idea of the new school, but only to present facts of what it will include.

Flyers and pamphlets can be handed out to parents or community members with the information on the new elementary building.

Board member Peter Tagley said he was appalled by the way the three meetings in the towns were conducted. He did not like there was not enough residents present at the meetings and the firms have not given enough information on the new elementary school.

He also said there is not enough of a voice from residents on what direction the Board of Education should be going.

Board member Michelle Gorra said the architects were trying to get a sense of the community and what they would look for in the design for the elementary school.

“It’s a school building and everything is straight-forward in most of the things that need to go into it,” said Ms. Gorra. “They [the firms] are going to come back with some ideas with plenty of room for input and it wasn’t the time for everyone to be discussing the project or the whole concept of the referendum.”

Ms. Gorra said the community will be able to weigh in later on the concepts the firm develops.

Board member Alan Brown attempted to make a motion to bring the question of a new consolidated school, without cost estimates, to a referendum.

However, member Greg Cava tabled the motion with a majority vote.

Chairman James Hirschfield, during his report, said it has been brought to his attention that both the Building and Facilities Committees are suffering from lack of board representation.

Mr. Hirschfield decided to terminate the Building Committee and have the facilities committee take over.

He said that if residents approve a new elementary school building, and he is still chair, then he will appoint a permanent building committee.

“There is some concern about the small representation of the board on these committees and how it’s hard to get a consensus because of the small representation,” said Mr. Hirschfield. “There’s been an issue raised on advisability of having members from the general public on these committees and also members of staff.”

Teresa DeBrito, director of curriculum and instruction for the region, gave an update on where Region 12 stands in the School Performance Index and the District Performance Index.

According to Ms. DeBrito, each student has an individual performance index developed by the state. The index is based on how a student scored on the CMT or CAPT.

If a student reaches goal or advances then he or she receives 100 percent credit; proficient counts as 67 percent; basic as 33 percent; below basic there is no credit.

Connecticut has the goal for students to reach 88 percent.

Burnham School in Bridgewater has a 95.5, which categorizes the school as excelling. Booth Free School in Roxbury scored 93.7 and Washington Primary 90.

Shepaug Middle School received a score of 91.4 and the high school received 84.1.

According to Ms. DeBrito, the scores have improved compared to last year.

Dr. Cosentino announced to the board she won a trip through the program Lifetouch Memory Mission. She will be traveling to Constanza, Dominican Republic, from January 21 to 28 and will be helping construct a school while connecting with other administrators from across the U.S. and other countries.

During that week, she plans a Google chat session with Shepaug on Friday, January 24, during which she will update students and the community on her progress in Constanza.

Leading up to the trip, Dr. Cosentino will visit Region 12 schools to create excitement for the trip. Any money she raises from now to the time of the trip, she will use for supplies to help the school.

The board approved two motions to create a smoke-free environment at Shepaug. The second motion removed an outdated policy that allowed students to smoke with a parent’s permission.

Friday, December 20, 2013

Region 12 a divided district over solution to declining enrollment


New Milford Spectrum

Published 6:49 pm, Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Declining student enrollments have spurred school officials throughout the area to take a hard look at the future of their educational facilities -- and the expenditure of taxpayers' dollars. From Ridgefield and Newtown to New Milford and Region 12, shrinking pupil populations have translated to under-utilized building space and prompted proposals to consolidate students in fewer schools.The issue had been a point of debate among officials and residents in both Ridgefield and Newtown in recent years, but both towns have put the matter on hold






In New Milford, officials seem to favor closing John Pettibone School, but there are residents who oppose that move because it would leave the largest geographic town in the state with just two elementary schools, it would require redistricting and longer bus rides for some students, it would mean grade reconfiguration, and not everyone is sold on the projections for declining enrollment.
But nowhere is the issue of school consolidation more contentious than in the Region 12 towns of Washington, Bridgewater and Roxbury.
Washington, the biggest town in the Shepaug Valley, has long sought to close the three elementary schools in the district and build a consolidated pre-K-to-grade-5 facility within its borders.
Meanwhile, Bridgewater has passionately resisted closing Burnham School, and Roxbury has strongly protected Booth Free School.
With student numbers dwindling in the district, Region 12 officials and residents considered a number of cost-saving options over the past couple of years.
It quickly became clear that Bridgewater and, to a lesser degree, Roxbury, did not want to become the only towns in Connecticut without hometown schools, with all the potential negative effects on their tight-knit communities, local economies and future demographics.
However, Washington officials did not keep their ears to the ground, and they were not sensitive to how important those two local schools are to the Bridgewater and Roxbury communities. Instead, they led a push for a consolidation proposal and the hiring of professional firms --- to the tune of $143,000 -- to draw up plans for such a facility.
Now, however, questions are being raised about whether the school board acted too hastily.
In order to consolidate, Region 12 voters would have to authorize a change in the 1967 regionalization plan that ensures each town will have a school. And as the result of a 2009 state Supreme Court ruling sought by Bridgewater, all three towns -- not just a majority of district voters -- would have to approve that change.
Pro-consolidation forces have argued, plausibly, that voters need to know what a new school would look like and what it would cost before deciding whether to change the regional plan.
Opponents of consolidation have contended, equally plausibly, that the experts should never have been hired until a vote was held on the regional plan and that if a proposed new plan is shot down, as they anticipate, Shepaug Valley taxpayers will have wasted $143,000.
It is clear, at least at this point, the Region 12 school district faces a rocky road in seeking a solution for its declining enrollment numbers.

Thursday, December 19, 2013

Region 12 struggles to escape 'quagmire'


New Milford Spectrum
Thursday, December 19, 2013

Published 5:57 pm, Wednesday, December 18, 2013



Region 12 is apparently caught in a "quagmire." At least members of the region's Board of Education appear to be stuck in neutral regarding the question of consolidation.
This was the opinion of board member Susan Stumpf, of Bridgewater, this week upon learning the board's attorney nixed proceeding to region-wide referendum with the question proposed by the board.
A dollar amount required for construction of a possible consolidated school for children from Washington, Bridgewater and Roxbury cannot be attached to a ballot question about amending the three towns' regional plan, board Chairman Jim Hirschfield, of Washington, told the board Monday.
There would have to be two ballot questions, he said, and who could vote on each issue would depend whether the voter's status be resident or taxpayer.
Having a dollar amount included in the ballot question had been the board's understood premise in hiring architectural firm Fletcher-Thompson for $104,000 to develop pre-referendum schematics and a cost for a new school.
"We're dead in the water," said board member Pete Tagley, of Washington. "Real dead. There's no overwhelming support for this."
"We're spending a lot of money," he added, "and I've had no direction from anyone in Washington telling me what they want us to do."
Stumpf agreed.
"I'm all for having the public guide the board," she said, "but we're not going in that direction. That's the quagmire we're in."
Fletcher-Thompson representatives held three "Future of Region 12" meetings during the last two weeks and met with school administrators and educators to glean "direction from the community" before beginning schematic designs.
"It was very informative," said Daniel Casinelli, of Fletcher-Thompson. "We heard pros and cons, which helped us in trying to understand the needs and concerns of the community."
Casinelli and his team presented their findings Monday to the Region 12 board.
"There is a strong sense that the community feel now existing in the three separate elementary schools should be maintained," said Angela Cahill of Fletcher-Thompson. "That would include having an intimate atmosphere for students and accommodating community activities to be held at the (new) school."
Whether Fletcher-Thompson's calculations will go before Region 12 voters remains to be seen.
Board vice chairman Alan Brown of Bridgewater called for an immediate referendum, with the sole question of whether the regional plan should be amended.
Brown's motion was tabled, but Hirschfield said he would review Brown's motion for the next meeting.
"If a referendum to amend the regional plan fails that's it," Hirschfield said. "But we want to present voters with the information they need to make an informed decision."
stuz@newstimes.com; 860-355-7322

Friday, December 13, 2013

Mixed reactions greet Region 12's 'future' tour


Friday, December 13, 2013



School officials and the architectural firm Fletcher-Thompson have a big job on their hands promoting the construction of a consolidated elementary school in Region 12.
Daniel L. Casinelli, a Fletcher-Thompson representative, and his team are on a speaking tour of the region's three towns, gathering resident input and promoting the project for the Board of Education.
Bridgewater residents resisted the firm's attempt to engage them during a Dec. 3 forum atBurnham School.
The following evening, the firm received a warmer response during a forum at Shepaug Valley Middle/High School for Washington.
A forum was also set Wednesday, Dec. 11 at Booth Free School in Roxbury.
In Bridgewater, Casinelli and his team were met with angst and anger as some 50 residents of the town essentially took control of the meeting.
Questions about why Fletcher-Thompson was hired for $102,000 and why a consolidation plan had come to this pre-referendum point took precedence over the actual plans.
Resident after resident expressed his or her displeasure with the region's proposal to close Burnham School.
Carolan Dwyer, an organizer of Save Our School, pointed out Bridgewater's three representatives on the Board of Education had repeatedly voted against consolidation plans.
The town does not want consolidation, she said.
The education board vote was 8 to 4 to hire Fletcher-Thompson and project managers Arcadis pre-referendum, at the cost of $102,000.
"We were hired to develop a conceptual design of a pre-K to fifth grade school and to determine the cost for the referendum," Casinelli said. "We're trying to understand why you like this (Burnham) school, what you would do to this school to improve it."
Parent Suzanne Creech responded.
"You're missing the point," she said. "This school is our community. Everyone gets involved in the school when their child is here and that carries on to membership in the fire department, to other areas of the town."
While Bridgewater residents are vehemently opposed to consolidation, the 12 parents from Roxbury and Washington in attendance Dec. 4 were readily onboard with discussing what they would like to see in a new consolidated school on the Shepaug campus.
"Some of the parents have a problem with this but the kids will be fine with it," said Washington father Jay Hubelbank. "It will make a better community for all the kids. Parents will all know each other from their children's first-grade years all the way through."
Roxbury mom Carrie DeMilio noted, "I don't like that currently schools like Burnham are right on the main street of the town. I work in a different school district and I like that you have to go through a guard station to get on campus."
Nicholas Macy, the senior project manager for Arcadis, said security would be a paramount concern in his company's oversight of a consolidated school project.
"School security is a topic everywhere we go," Macy said. "You want flexibility. You want to know kids are safe but you don't want to go over the top and have kids feel like they're going into a prison."
"We need to learn from you where that middle ground is from your perspective," he added.
Fletcher-Thompson and Arcadis staff will make a presentation of their findings to the Region 12 Board of Education Monday, Dec. 16 at 7 p.m. in the library at Shepaug Middle/High School.

Monday, December 9, 2013

Battle lines drawn in Region 12



NewsTimes


 

Published 7:51 pm, Friday, December 6, 2013
Region 12 is a school district deeply divided about its future.
The battle lines have been drawn, as they have been for literally decades, over whether the district should build a new consolidated pre-K-to-grade-5 elementary school near Shepaug Valley Middle High School in Washington or whether there should continue to be separate, local elementary schools in Washington, Bridgewater and Roxbury.
On one side stands Washington, by far the biggest of the three towns and the community which has fostered the consolidation movement.
On the other side stands Bridgewater, the smallest town and the fiercest defender of retaining local schools.
Pretty much in the middle -- geographically and philosophically -- is Roxbury, which has traditionally supported local schools, although not with quite the same passion as Bridgewater.
Over the years, advocates for consolidation have mounted serious proposals -- and even district-wide votes -- for a combined facility. Those consolidation plans have been shot down at every turn, but like Congressional Republicans who keep trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act, the pro-consolidation lobby just won't give up.
Consolidation has picked up a head of steam over the past couple of years, as declining enrollment projections have painted a picture of significantly underutilized space at Washington Primary School,Burnham School in Bridgewater and Booth Free School in Roxbury in the future.
After studying various options, Region 12 officials -- over strong objections from Bridgewater -- decided to try once again to gain public support for a consolidated school. According to Superintendent of Schools Pat Cosentino, the proposal is likely go to referendum in late March or early April.
Bridgewaterites have claimed -- with some justification -- that not enough consideration has been given to proposals that would have kept Burnham and/or Booth Free open. That could come back to haunt proponents of consolidation, since -- courtesy of a state Supreme Courtruling -- all three towns in Region 12 must approve any change in the regionalization plan. That means that Bridgewater -- or Roxbury -- voters wield a hammer and can prevent closure of their school by voting down the consolidation plan.
To be sure, there are some compelling arguments in favor of consolidation -- reduced operating costs, arguably improved educational opportunities, closer bonds among the towns, parents and children.
The case for consolidation is easier to sell -- and townspeople have far less to lose -- in Washington, where the school would be located, than in Bridgewater and Roxbury. A number of residents would probably prefer to keep open the old primary school right in the heart of Washington Depot, but a consolidated school would be just a short ride from the center of town.
For Roxbury and Bridgewater, it would be a whole different story. Instead of going to school right in the middle of town, just a short walk or ride from home, young children in those towns would face lengthy bus rides to and from school every day. That would be especially true for Bridgewater, whose town center is nearly 10 curvy, winding miles from the proposed school site.
I have often wondered how different the debate would be if plans called for a consolidated school in Bridgewater, meaning that Washington kids would lose their school and face the long bus rides.
For the two smaller towns, however, the anti-consolidation argument goes well beyond transportation issues.
Burnham School is the top-ranked elementary school among comparative schools and one of the highest rated in the entire state, and Booth Free isn't far behind.
As nearly four dozen Bridgewater residents made very clear at a Tuesday night meeting with architects and consultants working on the proposed project, they love their "phenomenal" school, their "great" teachers, and their "awesome" principal and PTO. Burnham School is an integral part of the close-knit Bridgewater community, and many residents simply don't want to see it closed.
And consider this: If Burnham and Booth Free are closed, Bridgewater and Roxbury would be the only two towns in the state without a school within their borders.
Nobody knows exactly what that would mean for those towns, but it is fair to be deeply concerned about the economic impact on local businesses, about property values, and about the future demographics of small towns that have no schools and -- for many young families -- one giant reason not to move there.
Pro-consolidation forces still have a few months to sell the project, and you never know how referendum votes will go.
But sadly, regardless of the outcome, it is likely the district will remain divided and hard feelings will linger, at least for some time -- an unfortunate state of affairs for three great little towns with so much in common.
Art Cummings is editor emeritus of The News-Times. He can be contacted at 203-731-3351 or at acummings@newstimes.com.

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

“No Way, No How”


“No Way, No How”

 by:

Bridgewater residents were adamant Tuesday that they will fight to the end to keep Burnham School open in their town.
A planned informational meeting by architectural firm Fletcher-Thompson designed to glean information on what residents would like to see in a new consolidated elementary school proposed for the region was quickly taken over by Bridgewater residents in attendance.
Some 50 residents of the small town attended the meeting at Burnham School and turned the discussion in a questioning period on their part about why the architects had been hired pre-referendum and why the process had come this far when the town’s representatives on the Region 12 Board of Education had repeated voted against the consolidation proposal.
Perhaps the architects will fare better when they address Washington residents tonight (Wednesday).